No gift has been given more times, in more countries, across more decades, than a flower presented to a mother. The gesture is so common as to seem inevitable — as though the connection between motherhood and flowers were a natural fact rather than a cultural construction, as though the carnation or the rose or the tulip had always carried this particular weight of feeling. They have not, of course. The flowers of Mother’s Day have histories: histories of grief and political demand, of commercial ingenuity and genuine sentiment, of the complicated love between children and the women who raised them, expressed in petals because petals were what was available and what, somehow, was always enough.
Before the Day — Flowers and Motherhood in the Ancient World
The association between flowers and the maternal principle is older than any formalised celebration and older than most of the cultural frameworks within which it has subsequently been understood. The great mother goddesses of the ancient world — Isis in Egypt, Cybele in Anatolia, Demeter in Greece, Ishtar in Mesopotamia — were consistently depicted with flowers, and the festivals associated with them involved the offering of blooms as a form of honouring the generative, nourishing power they represented.
The Greek festival of Mothering Sunday — Hilaria, in the spring celebration of Cybele — involved the decoration of the goddess’s temple with flowers gathered from the surrounding countryside, an act of adornment that honoured not only the divine mother but the fertility of the natural world that she governed. The flowers used were those available in the Mediterranean spring: narcissi, violets, anemones, and various wild blooms that grew in the hills above the great Anatolian cult centres. These were not flowers chosen for their meaning; their meaning was created by the act of offering, by the human decision to bring beauty to the divine and, in doing so, to acknowledge the beauty and generative power of what was being honoured.
The British tradition of Mothering Sunday — the fourth Sunday of Lent, historically the day on which people returned to their mother church and, by extension, to their mothers — also involved flowers from its earliest documented forms. The simnel cake and the posy of spring flowers were the characteristic gifts of the day in 17th- and 18th-century England, the flowers gathered from hedgerows and meadows by children making their way home along country lanes. These were not purchased flowers; they were found flowers, chosen by the eye of a child who had no commercial guidance, and their meaning was entirely relational: they were beautiful because they were given, and they were given because beauty was what could be offered.
The modern Mother’s Day — formally established in the United States by Anna Jarvis in 1914, following years of campaigning in memory of her mother Ann Reeves Jarvis — carried this pre-commercial flower tradition into the 20th century even as it simultaneously created the conditions for the commercialisation that Anna Jarvis herself would spend the rest of her life deploring. The flower at the centre of her conception of the day was the white carnation, and the story of that choice is, like every story in the history of Mother’s Day’s flowers, more complicated and more interesting than the commercial tradition that followed it suggests.
The White Carnation — Grief, Memory and the Founder’s Flower
Scientific name: Dianthus caryophyllus Colour: White (for mothers deceased); coloured (for mothers living) Principal symbolic regions: United States, where the tradition originated Adopted: 1908, by Anna Jarvis at the first organised Mother’s Day observance in Grafton, West Virginia
The white carnation was Ann Reeves Jarvis’s favourite flower, and when her daughter Anna organised the first formal Mother’s Day observance on the second Sunday of May 1908 — at the Andrews Methodist Episcopal Church in Grafton, West Virginia, where her mother had led a women’s peace and social activism group — she distributed 500 white carnations to members of the congregation in her mother’s memory. The choice was personal before it was symbolic: the white carnation was a memorial flower, chosen because it had been loved by a specific woman who was no longer alive to receive it.
The symbolic interpretation that followed was Anna Jarvis’s own elaboration. She explained that she had chosen the carnation because its petals do not fall but cling together even as the flower dies — a quality she read as an emblem of a mother’s love, persistent and undividing even in the face of death. The white colour signified the purity of maternal love: unconditional, unstained, not subject to the qualifications that govern other human affections. These were meanings she constructed retrospectively to explain a choice whose original motivation was simpler and more personal, but the meanings she constructed were coherent and resonant, and they spread with the day itself.
The distinction between white carnations (for mothers who had died) and coloured carnations (for mothers still living) was part of Anna Jarvis’s original conception and was observed carefully in the early years of the holiday’s American spread. This distinction gave the flower a commemorative depth unusual in celebratory floral symbolism: to wear or give a white carnation was to mark both the love of a living tradition and the grief of personal loss, holding both registers simultaneously. It was, in this sense, a more psychologically honest flower than the purely celebratory blooms that subsequent commercial floristry substituted for it.
Anna Jarvis’s relationship with the carnation tradition she created became one of the most poignant ironies in the history of public commemoration. As the holiday she had founded grew into a commercial phenomenon — driven by florists, confectioners, and greeting card companies whose commercial interests she had not anticipated and could not control — she turned against it with increasing vehemence. She sued to stop events that used the Mother’s Day name for commercial purposes, was arrested at a carnation sale fundraiser, and spent her later years and much of her family inheritance fighting the commercialisation of a day she had intended as a private, handwritten letter or a single flower of sincere sentiment. She died in 1948, in a sanitarium, her estate depleted by legal battles and her public statements increasingly bitter about the carnation sellers she blamed for corrupting her mother’s memory.
The carnation itself, meanwhile, spread globally as the primary Mother’s Day flower in American-influenced markets, accompanied by a commercial infrastructure that entirely inverted Anna Jarvis’s original intentions. The white carnation sold by the millions every May has the same botanical identity as the flower she distributed at Grafton in 1908; its symbolic life has been almost entirely transformed.
The Pink Carnation — Sweetness, Gratitude and the Living Mother
Scientific name: Dianthus caryophyllus Colour: Pink, light red Principal symbolic regions: United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia Adopted: Early 20th century, as the commercial variant of Anna Jarvis’s original white carnation
The pink carnation’s emergence as the characteristic Mother’s Day flower for living mothers developed naturally from Anna Jarvis’s original white/coloured distinction, but with a softening of the political and commemorative charge that had given the distinction its meaning. Where Anna Jarvis’s coloured carnations for living mothers were simply any coloured variety as distinct from white, the commercial floristry trade’s preference for pink — soft, warm, associated with femininity, maternal love, and the gentlest register of affection — gradually narrowed the field until pink carnation and Mother’s Day became, in many markets, nearly synonymous.
The carnation’s remarkable longevity as a cut flower — lasting significantly longer in a vase than most alternatives — is not a trivial factor in its commercial dominance. A Mother’s Day flower that dies within days of the gift creates a different sentiment from one that persists for a week or more, and the carnation’s persistence was understood, even by the commercial trade, as part of its symbolic fitness for a day about enduring love. The flower’s scent — spicy, warm, faintly clove-like — is distinctive enough to be immediately recognisable but not so overpowering as to be intrusive, qualities that made it suitable for the domestic environments in which most Mother’s Day flowers are displayed.
The carnation’s long history in cultivation — documented in ancient Greece, extensively cultivated in medieval European monastery gardens, a staple of the Elizabethan flower garden — gave it the cultural depth of a flower with a history, even if most of the people who gave and received it were unaware of that history. Dianthus caryophyllus appears in Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale, where Perdita offers carnations and gillyflowers (an older name for carnations) to her guests; in the medieval language of flowers, the carnation signified love and fascination. This pre-existing symbolic life, accumulated over centuries before Anna Jarvis gave the flower its specific Mother’s Day identity, was available to be drawn on even without conscious reference.
The Rose — The Arrived Usurper
Scientific name: Rosa species, principally modern hybrid tea roses Colour: Pink and red principally, also white, yellow, and mixed Principal symbolic regions: Global, particularly dominant in East Asian markets and increasingly in Western commercial contexts Adopted: Progressively through the 20th century as commercial floristry shifted preferences
The rose’s current dominance in the global Mother’s Day flower market is a 20th-century development that post-dates and in some markets has substantially displaced the carnation tradition. Its rise reflects not a symbolic argument — no tradition replaced the carnation’s meaning with the rose’s meaning through any comparable act of conscious symbolism — but the market forces of the global cut flower industry, within which the rose is the dominant commodity, produced in enormous quantities in Dutch greenhouses and Colombian, Kenyan, and Ecuadorian growing fields, available year-round in every colour and size, and carrying the broadest possible pre-existing symbolic associations.
The rose’s association with love in the broadest sense — romantic love, parental love, affection, appreciation — makes it suitable for Mother’s Day without requiring any specific symbolic argument. It does not mean mother the way the white carnation means maternal grief or the mimosa means women’s political dignity; it means love, and love between mothers and children qualifies. This generality is commercially advantageous and symbolically thin, and the comparison between the carnation’s specific, historically grounded symbolism and the rose’s generic love-flower status is a comparison that does not favour the rose except on commercial grounds.
Pink roses, in particular, have become strongly associated with Mother’s Day in markets where the holiday’s commercial expression has most thoroughly displaced its historical roots. The specific shade of pink — soft, warm, slightly peachy in many commercial varieties — is deliberately positioned to evoke maternal warmth and tenderness without the political charge of red or the mournfulness of white. This colour management is a form of symbolic engineering, and it is worth being conscious of: the pink rose of the commercial Mother’s Day is not a flower that chose its symbolism; it is a flower whose symbolism has been chosen for it by the marketing departments of the cut flower industry.
The exceptions to this generalisation are real and should be acknowledged. A gardener who grows a particular rose from a cutting given by her mother, and who brings roses from that plant to her mother’s grave, has a specific and irreplaceable relationship with those roses that no amount of commercial context can dissolve. The personal symbolic life of flowers — the relationship between a particular bloom and a particular memory, a particular person and a particular garden — operates at a level of specificity that commercial symbolism cannot reach and should not be mistaken for.
The Tulip — Spring, New Life and the Dutch Gift
Scientific name: Tulipa species and hybrids Colour: All colours; pink and red most associated with Mother’s Day Principal symbolic regions: The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Canada Adopted: 20th century, through the dominance of Dutch floriculture in global cut flower markets
The tulip’s association with Mother’s Day in many northern European markets and in Canada reflects the convergence of two distinct traditions: the bulb’s natural flowering time in the northern hemisphere spring, which aligns with both British Mothering Sunday and the American Mother’s Day in May; and the dominance of Dutch flower growing — and Dutch horticultural culture — in the global cut flower industry, which has made the tulip one of the most widely available and commercially promoted spring flowers in the world.
The tulip has no specific Mother’s Day symbolism in the way that the white carnation carries Anna Jarvis’s specific intentional meaning. It arrived at Mother’s Day through floristry’s seasonal logic: tulips are what is available, and abundant, and beautiful, in March and April and May across the northern hemisphere, and availability combined with beauty is a sufficient commercial rationale for associating a flower with a celebration in the same season.
The tulip’s history — its Ottoman origins, its explosive reception in 17th-century Europe, its tulip mania as the first speculative bubble in the history of global capitalism, its subsequent normalisation into the most democratic of bulb flowers — gives it a cultural biography that could sustain a symbolic life as rich as any flower in this guide, but that biography is not what most people are thinking about when they give tulips on Mother’s Day. They are thinking about colour, about spring, about the particular pleasure of a generous bunch of flowers whose long stems and bold heads fill a room with a specific kind of cheerful abundance that is its own sufficient argument for the giving.
This is not a trivial point. The symbolic histories traced in this guide are real and worth knowing, but they are not the only thing flowers do. A bunch of tulips given in love and received with pleasure has a completeness that symbolic analysis cannot fully account for. The flower works — it communicates, it delights, it marks the occasion — without the giver and receiver needing to know anything about tulip mania or Dutch floriculture or the Ottoman sultans who cultivated the first double-flowered varieties. The pleasure of flowers is real independent of their symbolic meaning, and any guide that suggests otherwise is measuring the wrong thing.
The Lily — Purity, Beauty and the Classical Mother
Scientific name: Lilium species, particularly Lilium longiflorum (Easter lily) and Oriental hybrids Colour: White principally, also pink, yellow, and mixed Principal symbolic regions: United States (particularly through Christian traditions), Japan, South Korea Adopted: Through overlapping Easter and Mother’s Day traditions in Christian contexts; through Japanese hahanohi flower culture
The lily’s position in Mother’s Day floristry derives from two overlapping traditions. In Christian cultures of the northern hemisphere, the lily’s association with the Virgin Mary — the archetypal mother of the religious tradition — gives it a specific fitness for a day honouring mothers that no other flower quite matches. The Easter lily in particular, which blooms in March and April in the northern hemisphere and has been associated with the Resurrection since at least the 19th century, bridges the Easter and Mother’s Day seasons in a way that makes its use across both occasions feel continuous rather than coincidental.
The Madonna lily (Lilium candidum), the specific species most closely associated with the Virgin Mary in Western Christian iconography, carries a symbolic history of maternal purity and divine grace that the commercial Mother’s Day trade has partly inherited and partly diluted. In formal Catholic and high Anglican contexts, the lily’s Marian associations remain active and relevant to its use on Mothering Sunday. In the broader secular market, the lily’s meaning has generalised into beauty, elegance, and the particular kind of dignity associated with maternal love at its most idealised.
In Japan, where Mother’s Day (Hahanohi) is celebrated on the second Sunday of May following American influence after the Second World War, red carnations were initially adopted as the characteristic flower, mirroring the American tradition. However, red and pink carnations have in recent decades been partially supplemented by the use of lilies and chrysanthemums — flowers with deeper roots in Japanese floral culture and its associated symbolic traditions. The Japanese aesthetic principle of hanakotoba — the language of flowers, in which each flower carries specific symbolic meanings — gives the Mother’s Day flower selection a layer of intentional meaning-making that the commercial Western tradition generally lacks. Pink lilies signify ambition and aspiration; white lilies carry purity and the grace of refined femininity; chrysanthemums, as the flower of the Imperial family and of longevity, carry respect and deep esteem.
The Chrysanthemum — Respect, Longevity and the Eastern Tradition
Scientific name: Chrysanthemum morifolium Colour: All colours; yellow, white, and pink most associated with maternal celebration Principal symbolic regions: Japan, China, South Korea, Australia Adopted: Through East Asian floral culture; specific Mother’s Day association in Australia and Japan
In Australia, the chrysanthemum is so strongly associated with Mother’s Day that the holiday is sometimes colloquially called chrysanthemum day. The association arose from the fortunate convergence of the Australian autumn calendar — Mother’s Day falls in May, which is early autumn in the southern hemisphere — with the chrysanthemum’s natural autumn flowering season. The flower that blooms most abundantly at the time of the celebration becomes, almost inevitably, the celebration’s flower, and the chrysanthemum’s abundance, its longevity as a cut flower, and the practical ease of obtaining it from Australian gardens in May have made it the dominant Mother’s Day bloom in Australian floristry.
The symbolic resonance of the chrysanthemum with maternal love draws on the flower’s deep associations in East Asian culture with longevity, resilience, and the cultivation of inner virtue. In Chinese symbolism, the chrysanthemum represents the scholar who remains true to principle in difficult circumstances — who blooms, as the chrysanthemum does, in the cold of autumn when other flowers have retreated. Applied to motherhood, this symbolic register speaks to the endurance and constancy of maternal love across all seasons of life, the commitment that persists through difficulty as the chrysanthemum persists through the first frosts.
The chrysanthemum’s yellow varieties carry the additional symbolic weight of the flower’s association with the sun — with warmth, energy, and the generative power that Chinese medical and philosophical traditions attribute to the sun’s yang quality. A yellow chrysanthemum given to a mother is, in this symbolic register, a gift of warmth and vital energy as much as a gift of beauty, a recognition of the life-giving quality of maternal presence.
The Peony — Abundance, Care and the Chinese Mother’s Day
Scientific name: Paeonia suffruticosa (tree peony), Paeonia lactiflora (herbaceous peony) Colour: Pink, red, white, and deep magenta Principal symbolic regions: China, where it is the national flower; spreading through Chinese diaspora communities Adopted: Through Chinese Muqin Jie celebrations and the flower’s existing associations with feminine beauty and abundance
The peony is China’s national flower and its most culturally significant ornamental bloom — the flower of wealth, good fortune, and feminine beauty that Tang dynasty poets competed to praise and Tang emperors cultivated in the imperial gardens of Chang’an in hundreds of varieties. Its association with Mother’s Day in China and among Chinese diaspora communities worldwide is inseparable from these existing symbolic associations: to give a peony to one’s mother is to acknowledge her beauty, her abundance, and the fortunate richness of life that her care has provided.
The peony’s specific symbolic fitness for maternal celebration lies in its form as much as its colour. A fully opened peony is an overwhelming flower — its many petals arranged in successive layers of such generosity that the bloom seems almost excessive, a quantity of beauty that abundance itself can barely contain. This extravagance of form is precisely the quality that makes it symbolically appropriate for the occasion: maternal love, in the cultural imagination that the peony articulates, is not moderate or carefully proportioned. It is the full opening of the flower, the giving of everything, the beauty that does not hold back.
In Chinese floral symbolism, the peony signifies fùguì — wealth and honour — and this association extends naturally to the Mother’s Day context as a recognition of the wealth of care and honour of devotion that mothers have provided. To give a peony is to say, in the compressed language of flowers, that what was given was of the highest value; that the abundance received did not go unrecognised.
The Forget-Me-Not — Remembrance and the Mothers Who Are Gone
Scientific name: Myosotis species Colour: Pale blue, occasionally pink or white Principal symbolic regions: United Kingdom, northern Europe, North America Adopted: Through Victorian floral symbolism; specific Mother’s Day associations through the commemoration tradition
The forget-me-not enters the Mother’s Day symbolic tradition through the same logic that makes the white carnation its specific emblem: the logic of loss. Mother’s Day is not only a celebration of living mothers; it is also, for the many people who observe it in the absence of a mother who has died, a day of grief as much as celebration. The flowers appropriate to this dimension of the day are those that speak to memory rather than to present joy — and the forget-me-not, whose name is its entire symbolic meaning, is the most directly applicable.
Anna Jarvis understood this dual dimension from the beginning. Her original white carnation was a memorial flower, given in a church on a day that was, for her, primarily an act of remembrance. The forget-me-not operates in the same register: small, persistent, returning year after year from seed in gardens where the person being remembered once walked, it is a flower whose very habit of growth — its faithful reappearance — enacts the persistence of memory that its name invokes.
For the growing cultural practice of marking Mother’s Day through charitable giving to organisations supporting maternal health and child welfare — a practice that Anna Jarvis would have recognised as closer to her original intentions than the commercial flower trade — the forget-me-not has become a significant fundraising symbol in several countries. Its blue associates it with memory and constancy; its small scale with the individual, personal nature of grief; and its name with the single most important thing that those who have lost their mothers want to be able to say: that they have not forgotten.
The Orchid — Luxury, Exoticism and the Contemporary Gift
Scientific name: Phalaenopsis and other cultivated species Colour: White, pink, purple, yellow, and multi-coloured varieties Principal symbolic regions: Global, particularly strong in East Asian and Australasian markets; growing in European and American luxury segments Adopted: Late 20th and early 21st centuries, as the mass-market orchid became accessible through Dutch greenhouse cultivation
The orchid’s presence in the contemporary Mother’s Day market is a 21st-century phenomenon made possible by the same Dutch greenhouse revolution that democratised the rose and the tulip before it. Phalaenopsis orchids — the moth orchid whose graceful arching stems and long-lasting blooms now appear in every supermarket and petrol station — were, until the 1990s, specialist collector’s plants available only through dedicated orchid nurseries at significant expense. The development of clonal tissue culture propagation and large-scale greenhouse production in the Netherlands and Taiwan reduced the price of Phalaenopsis dramatically while maintaining the plant’s appearance of exotic luxury, creating a flower whose market position as an accessible luxury — more expensive than a bunch of carnations, but within reach of most consumers — made it perfectly suited to the aspirational register of contemporary gift-giving.
The orchid’s specific symbolic associations with Mother’s Day are relatively thin — the flower arrived at the celebration through commercial floristry logic rather than symbolic tradition — but its general connotations of elegance, refinement, and lasting beauty (a Phalaenopsis in good conditions can bloom for three months) align it naturally with a gift intended to express deep appreciation. Its longevity as a houseplant — surviving and reblooming year after year in the hands of a moderately attentive gardener — gives it a persistence that cut flowers lack, and the possibility of a plant that continues to grow in the home, reblooming each year as a living memorial to the occasion of its giving, has made it attractive to givers who want their gift to last beyond the immediate occasion.
In East Asian cultural contexts, the orchid carries a symbolic weight absent from its Western commercial deployment. The orchid is one of the Four Gentlemen of Chinese scholarly painting — together with plum blossom, bamboo, and chrysanthemum — and its associations with refined virtue, modest beauty, and the cultivation of inner quality make it a flower of genuine depth in the Chinese symbolic tradition. To give a potted orchid to a Chinese mother on Muqin Jie is to invoke this tradition, whether or not the giver is consciously aware of doing so.
The Wattle — Australian Warmth and the Southern Hemisphere Spring
Scientific name: Acacia pycnantha (golden wattle) and related species Colour: Brilliant yellow Principal symbolic regions: Australia Adopted: Through the proximity of Mother’s Day to the wattle’s autumn flowering in the southern hemisphere
Australia’s golden wattle — the national floral emblem, which flowers in late summer and early autumn — brings its brilliant yellow to Mother’s Day celebrations in a way that mirrors the mimosa’s role in Italian International Women’s Day. Both are Acacia species; both bloom with the same characteristic spherical yellow flower clusters; and both carry the quality of incandescent yellow that seems to function, across cultural contexts, as a colour of celebration and warmth.
The wattle’s specific Australian associations — with national identity, with the bush, with the particular quality of Australian light in early autumn — give it a local specificity that the imported carnation or rose cannot match. For many Australians, a bunch of wattle on Mother’s Day is a statement of both affection and place: a way of giving something that could only come from here, could only be given by someone who knows this landscape and its seasonal rhythms. In a country whose cultural relationship with its own flora has been complicated by the legacy of European settlement and the long dominance of imported ornamental plants, the choice of wattle for a significant celebration carries a quiet weight of cultural self-recognition.
The Language of Colour — What Different Shades Say
The colour of a Mother’s Day flower is not incidental to its meaning. The tradition of colour symbolism in floristry — formalised in the Victorian language of flowers and now embedded in commercial floristry practice — assigns meanings to flower colours that operate independently of the specific flower involved, creating a second layer of symbolic communication that overlays the flower’s own identity.
Pink — the dominant colour of the commercial Mother’s Day palette — communicates warmth, tenderness, and affection in their most approachable and uncomplicated forms. It is a colour that does not demand or challenge; it asks only to be received as an expression of gentle love. The commercial dominance of pink in Mother’s Day floristry reflects a conception of maternal love as warm and tender above all else — a conception that is not wrong but is partial, omitting the fiercer, more demanding, and sometimes more difficult dimensions of the maternal relationship.
White communicates purity, remembrance, and the particular dignity of grief. Anna Jarvis’s white carnation understood this; so does the white lily and the white chrysanthemum in traditions where they are used for both celebration and mourning. White is the colour of the dual occasion — the Mother’s Day that holds both the living and the dead, the celebration and the loss.
Yellow — the colour of mimosa, wattle, and certain chrysanthemum and rose varieties — communicates warmth, energy, and the particular joy of spring and new life. It is the most unambiguously cheerful of the Mother’s Day palette’s colours, and its increasing presence in Mother’s Day floristry alongside or in place of the dominant pink reflects a cultural shift toward a more energetic and less purely sentimental register of maternal celebration.
Red — present in red roses, red carnations, and the deeper varieties of many Mother’s Day flowers — carries the associations of passion and deep love that are not exclusively maternal but are certainly applicable. The red carnation used in Japanese Hahanohi tradition draws on this register: a depth of feeling beyond the polite and the decorative, the love that is serious rather than sweet.
The Personal Flower — What No Guide Can Determine
Any guide to the flowers of Mother’s Day must end, finally, by acknowledging the category it cannot address: the personal flower. The flower that a specific mother grew in her garden and whose seeds were saved across decades. The flower that bloomed every year on the anniversary of a loss and became, by that coincidence, a flower of memorial. The flower that a child picked from a roadside verge, imperfect and immediately wilting, and presented with the absolute confidence that it was the right choice — because the right choice for a child giving a flower to their mother is always the one they chose.
The symbolic histories traced in this guide are real and worth knowing. Anna Jarvis and her white carnation, the Victorian language of flowers and its colour codes, the Japanese hanakotoba and its careful assignments of meaning, the Italian mimosa and its partisan roots — these are genuine traditions, and knowing them deepens the act of giving and receiving the flowers they describe.
But they are not, and never could be, the whole story of the flowers of Mother’s Day. That story is held, in its most essential form, in the particular memories of particular people: the mother who always had sweet peas growing along the back fence, the grandmother who brought irises in from the garden in a glass jar, the father who bought tulips from a petrol station forecourt in a motorway service area and gave them, somewhat sheepishly, on behalf of children who had forgotten the day.
The flower works in all of these cases. It works because a flower given in love has a quality that transcends its botanical identity, its symbolic history, its commercial origin, and even its aesthetic merit. It works because the gesture of giving — the decision to mark an occasion with something that will bloom and will fade, that is beautiful now and will not always be beautiful, that is perishable and therefore precious — is itself a form of meaning-making that flowers, alone among the objects available to us, seem perfectly designed to sustain.
The given flower is the message. What it says depends on who gives it, to whom, on which occasion, in which garden or hospital room or kitchen, with what degree of consciousness about what it means and what degree of simple, untheorised affection. No guide can determine this. The flowers are all correct. The act of giving is what matters.
在〈A Guide to the Blooms of Mother’s Day〉中有 0 則留言